OBJECTIVE: To examine whether some drivers with hemianopia or quadrantanopia display safe driving skills on the road compared with drivers with normal visual fields. ----------\ud\udMETHOD: An occupational therapist evaluated 22 people with hemianopia, 8 with quadrantanopia, and 30 with normal vision for driving skills during naturalistic driving using six rating scales. ---------- \ud\udRESULTS: Of drivers with normal vision, >90% drove flawlessly or had minor errors. Although drivers with hemianopia were more likely to receive poorer ratings for all skills, 59.1%–81.8% performed with no or minor errors. A skill commonly problematic for them was lane keeping (40.9%). Of 8 drivers with quadrantanopia, 7 (87.5%) exhibited no or minor errors. ----------\ud\udCONCLUSION: This study of people with hemianopia or quadrantanopia with no lateral spatial neglect highlights the need to provide individual opportunities for on-road driving evaluation under natural traffic conditions if a person is motivated to return to driving after brain injury.
展开▼
机译：目的：研究与正常视野的驾驶员相比，某些患有偏盲或偏盲的驾驶员在道路上是否显示出安全的驾驶技能。方法：一名职业治疗师使用六个等级量表对22名偏盲，8名象限和30名视力正常的自然驾驶者的驾驶技能进行了评估。 ---------- \ ud \ ud结果：在视力正常的驾驶员中，> 90％的驾驶员无故障驾驶或有轻微错误。尽管患有偏盲的驾驶员在所有技能上的评分均较差，但59.1％–81.8％的驾驶员表现为无错误或轻微错误。对于他们来说，通常有问题的一项技能是保持车道（40.9％）。在8名患有象限的驾驶员中，有7名（87.5％）没有表现出轻微错误。 ---------- \ ud \ ud结论：这项针对偏侧偏盲而没有侧向空间偏见的人的研究强调，如果一个人有动力，则需要为自然交通条件下的道路驾驶评估提供个人机会在脑部受伤后恢复驾驶。
展开▼
